John Carpenter's iconic 1982 sci-fi horror film, *The Thing*, has captivated audiences with its ambiguous ending for over four decades. Fans have speculated whether R.J. MacReady, portrayed by Kurt Russell, or Childs, played by Keith David, transforms into the film's titular monster. Carpenter, however, has kept fans guessing—until a recent revelation.
During a special 4K screening of *The Thing* at the David Geffen Theater in Los Angeles on March 22, Carpenter disclosed to acclaimed director Bong Joon Ho that a "giant hint" exists within the film, indicating who ultimately becomes The Thing. In a playful twist, Carpenter added that he'd reveal this secret to anyone who sent an undisclosed amount of money to his home in an envelope.
Carpenter also shared that the actors were kept in the dark about their characters' fates. "They had no clue," he said, emphasizing the need for them to convincingly portray human characters. "The creature imitates perfectly. It could be one of us, it could be somebody in the audience, and there's no way of telling. So I knew, they didn't know."
Following the screening, indie director Joe Russo (not to be confused with the MCU's Joe Russo) shared his theory on X / Twitter, suggesting he had uncovered Carpenter's hint. Russo pointed out that MacReady, aware that the creature can replicate at the cellular level and that they should only consume items they've personally handled, still shares his liquor with Childs at the film's end. This act, Russo theorizes, implies MacReady might be The Thing, as sharing the bottle could contaminate Childs. "As soon as Childs drinks from the bottle, The Thing has won," Russo concluded, suggesting MacReady's transformation would neutralize the last remaining threat.
Carpenter's film masterfully leaves these theories unconfirmed, maintaining its mystique. Russo further supported his theory by analyzing the film's final line, "Why don't we just wait here for a little while, see what happens?" He suggested this line fits if MacReady is already The Thing. Additionally, Russo proposed an alternative interpretation of a key scene where MacReady kills what appears to be The Thing, suggesting viewers might have witnessed a superior imitation eliminating a lesser one to better infiltrate society upon rescue.
The 25 Best Horror Movies
26 Images
While some fans found Russo's theory compelling, others remained convinced that Childs is the creature, citing his unexplained absence before the final scene. One fan noted, "I still think it’s Childs because we don’t know his whereabouts for a long time heading into the final scene. But Keith David will tell you he’s 100% not The Thing." Russo responded, "Carpenter said both actors don't know... Childs always felt like a red herring to me."
Regardless of the debate, Carpenter's ability to keep fans engaged and theorizing decades later is a testament to his storytelling prowess. His continued insights into *The Thing* only add to the film's enduring legacy.